Question 1 of 8
Your organization is evaluating two projects. Project Alpha has an NPV of $320,000 and requires an initial investment of $500,000. Project Beta has an NPV of $180,000 and requires an initial investment of $200,000. Both projects have the same risk profile. Which project should be selected and why?
- A.Project Alpha, because it has the higher absolute NPV of $320,000
- B.Project Alpha, because larger investments always yield more strategic value
- C.Project Beta, because it requires less capital and therefore carries less financial risk, making it the more conservative and risk-adjusted choice for capital preservation.
- D.Project Beta, because it has a higher NPV-to-investment ratio (0.90) compared to Alpha (0.64), indicating better capital efficiency.
Show answer and explanation
Correct answer: D
When capital is constrained and projects have similar risk profiles, the NPV-to-investment ratio (profitability index) is the better criterion. Beta's ratio is $180K / $200K = 0.90, while Alpha's is $320K / $500K = 0.64. Alpha has a higher absolute NPV but uses 2.5x more capital for only 1.78x more value. Larger investments do not automatically mean more strategic value. Risk reduction alone is not sufficient justification without the value ratio context.