Question 1 of 11
Your project's critical path activity is running two weeks behind. The project deadline is fixed. Which schedule compression technique preserves the original scope while adding the LEAST risk?
- A.Fast tracking — overlap activities that were originally planned sequentially
- B.Crashing — add resources to the critical path activities
- C.Scope reduction — remove lower-priority deliverables
- D.Risk acceptance — inform the sponsor the deadline will be missed
Show answer and explanation
Correct answer: B
Crashing adds resources to critical path activities and generally introduces less risk than fast tracking because activities are not overlapped. Fast tracking increases rework and coordination risk by performing activities in parallel that were designed to be sequential. Scope reduction changes the project scope. Risk acceptance does not recover the schedule.